Showing posts with label Juno. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Juno. Show all posts

Thursday, September 25, 2008

(Fictional) Feminist Icon: Matilda

Matilda Wormwood is a feminist icon; she may not have been written with that in mind, but Matilda herself and the book in general is full of what I would deem feminist thought. First and foremost is the fact that Matilda is not a girl who misses much. She is intelligent, poised, and fully in control. She doesn't care about dolls or keeping house. She is uninterested in watching television or learning from her mother how to catch and keep a man. She is interested in reading; she is shown proactively seeking out the library and books she can become engrossed in. She is shown to be almost better at math than she is at reading. She is a mathematical genius. And she is someone who is analytical and who can devise strategies for dealing with imbecilic parents and violent headmistresses. When her book gets torn up by her enraged father, she doesn't cry; she simply figures out a way to get even, and doesn't get caught. She is the very height of precocious child, but what is almost more important is that she isn't alone.

I have heard some criticism about movies like Juno being that only the title character is a fully formed, intelligent girl. Juno is an anomaly in her world because she is smart and sassy and in control. Other movies or shows or books have a smart woman character who very rarely interacts with other women characters. Harry Potter generally falls into this plight in regard to Hermione Granger. No matter how great a character Hermione is, she is the only fully formed girl the books offer. We often hear about how great Ginny is, but the fact is the character has very little agency throughout the book series. We are told she is brilliant and to love her, but she never becomes fully formed. These sort of token women aren't really a step forward for women in fiction; they generally seem to be there because it is un-PC to have a movie or television show without a woman on it anymore. But Matilda is different. Roald Dahl created a world where we are introduced to more fully formed women than men. Mr. Wormwood is really the only man we meet who is of any note in the novel, with Bruce Bogtrotter and Nigel playing lesser roles for male representation. We have Matilda, obviously. But also Matilda's best friend Lavender, who is described as being "gutsy and adventurous"; Lavender and Matilda are the two girls in their age group given the most focus in the novel, and both girls admire in the other a keen sense of action; Lavender decides to play a prank on the Trunchbull in order to be a heroine like Hortensia and Matilda. These aren't girls for whom being the heroine of the tale is to wait to be rescued or for a man to take care of the monster but who expect to do it themselves and without reservation. The same thing can be noted for the character of Hortensia, who at the age of ten is still more interested in regaling newcomers with her tales of epic battle than she is in fashion or boys or expecting Bruce to be the one to come up with the really great pranks.

And the book goes beyond just putting forth good role models for girls into skewering anti-intellectualism. When Mrs. Wormwood tells Miss Honey, "You chose books. I chose looks" and proclaims that she is the one who finished better off, we are meant to recognize the ridiculousness in that statement. When Mr. Wormwood dismisses going to a university as a worthwhile goal, Miss Honey gets the last word when she retorts, "If you had a heart attack this minute and had to call a doctor, that doctor would be a university graduate. If you got sued for selling someone a rotten second-hand car, you'd have to get a lawyer and he'd be a university graduate, too. Do not despise clever people, Mr. Wormwood".

What the book succeeds in doing is presenting different forms of women. Women aren't universally praised; Mrs. Wormwood and the Trunchbull are examples of how women can be just as small-minded and evil as men. But the Trunchbull especially is placed alongside other women, and she is defeated by a girl as well. The book manages to be about girl power without minimizing that effect by repackaging it in a Spice Girls "We still care about looks and make-up" way. It is a book about an extraordinary little girl who encounters other noteworthy women. It is a book that manages to make a girl who is immersed in learning both approachable and successful, both happy and well-adjusted. It is a book about a girl who is proud of how intelligent she is and who isn't afraid to demonstrate that intellect, who has never absorbed the lessons set forth by society that intelligence is bad and is doubly bad to have if one is a woman. Because that message is the triumphant one in the book, because Matilda is so smart and active and in control and Dahl presents it as a good thing, Matilda succeeds in being a feminist tale, and a brilliant one at that.

Special thanks to my best friend, whose copy of Matilda I stole more than a few years ago...

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Pregnant Teens: Part 2

I'm sure I'm not the only person who had an adverse reaction to the cover of OK! Magazine with Jamie Lynn Spears. Just the subtitle of "Being a mom is the best feeling in the world" is enough to make me roll my eyes when it is coming out of a teenager's mouth. Now, I realize most celebrity parents aren't like Angelina Jolie, who -in a fit of complete honesty- told reporters that Shiloh looked like a "blob" when she was born. I realize that new mothers are pressured to feel like motherhood is always the best feeling in the world, and reacting in an opposite way -admitting fatigue, feelings of despondency and depression, not immediately 'clicking' with the infant, being overwhelmed- oftentimes leads to a less than pleasant reaction. This is one of the reasons that postpartum depression is such a hot button issue, and why Brooke Shields is something of an inspiration by writing her book "Here Comes The Rain" and writing an op-ed for the New York Times about it -and Tom Cruise, of course. We as a society do not like to believe that mothers are capable of not feeling instantly connected to their children. Those feelings are complicated when there is a teenage pregnancy involved. Oftentimes, the initial reaction is to condemn the teen mother, to react to her in revulsion and disgust; to demand chastisement and punishment. The documentary about a high school basketball team, "The Heart of the Game", demonstrates that amply after its star player, Darnellia Russell, gets pregnant, has her child, goes back to high school, and returns to the school team. She was the subject of talk show radio, where concerned callers denigrated her for having premarital sex and expressed concern about "the baby", what with Russell's return to school and basketball. Which is why I'm torn about Jamie Lynn Spears.

I can commiserate with OK!'s executive editor's statement of "We didn't go down there to slap this girl on the wrist and tell her off". Jamie Lynn Spears shouldn't be treated like dirt, and she shouldn't be sequestered away from the world just because she had  sex and got pregnant. At the same time, I am against normalizing teen pregnancy. It is a fine line, and I don't think that covers like this one walk it. I loved Juno; I liked the message it sent about how getting pregnant as a teen wasn't the end of the world, and the movie was able to return Juno's life to how it had been pre-pregnancy by having her find a home for her child. But real life isn't like that. Teen moms are less likely to get a high school education and more likely to remain a single parent. A sizable amount of Newsweek readers, though not a majority, are for examples like Jamie Lynn, because it shows a successful teen mother. But Jamie Lynn Spears isn't an example of a successful teen mother, but of a teen who was commercially successful and then became pregnant. That isn't just a horse of a different color but an entirely different species. If the media held up examples of actually successful teen mothers -people like Darnellia Russell- juxtaposed with people like Candi Johnson, who hasn't yet been able to balance motherhood with success, I would be happier. When Jamie Lynn Spears and her pregnancy are held up as an example that teen mothers "can live a perfect, happy, normal life", something has gone seriously wrong.

What is also wrong is the part of the discussion that is absent. Contraceptives aren't mentioned. No "Did you think about using condoms?" No "I was on the pill but was also taking some antibiotics". Sex=babies. No caveats, no conditions, no way to circumvent the fact that sex=babies. And that is a travesty, because teens getting pregnant isn't just a product of sex, but a product of sex without protection, or without adequate protection. I would expect a part of the discussion to be about education; to be about pregnancy prevention. Too often, what is discussed is the pregnancy itself, and not what came before (the sex) or after (the 18+ years of child care). And that is wrong.

What is also wrong is the fact that another aspect of teenage pregnancy is maligned: the abortion. 1/3 of all pregnant teens have abortions; but the only way a teenager can "take responsibility" is by having the baby. As society rushes out to avoid ostracizing teen parents, they neglect a whole other portion of teens. Their rush to accept one group relegates another to the screw up pile. And that is also unfortunate. These teens, anonymous as they may be, deserve to be a part of the dialogue as well, to have their choice be acknowledged as one that may have been the best for them, even if fetuses do have finger nails.